Stay Informed

Sign up to receive the Middle East Bulletin!

Support Middle East Progress

In-Depth Coverage

Original Commentaries

11/13/08
The View from Gaza  —Taghreed El-Khodary, New York Times journalist in Gaza and Harvard University Nieman Fellow (2005-2006). Interviewed by Middle East Bulletin.
11/04/08
Getting on the Right Track  —Dalia Rabin, chairperson, Rabin Center, and daughter of the late Yitzhak Rabin. Interview with Middle East Bulletin.
10/23/08
Bottom-Up Meets Top-Down for Progress  —Robert Danin, Head of Mission, Office of Quartet Representative Tony Blair and former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near East Affairs. Interview with Middle East Bulletin.

Setting the Record Straight

U.S. Policy Strengthens Iran

"Simply put, without permanent bases in Iraq, a nuclear capable Islamic Republic cannot be contained."
—Michael Rubin, resident scholar, American Enterprise Institute, "Can a Nuclear Iran Be Contained or Deterred?" Middle Eastern Outlook, November 5, 2008 versus
  • “[B]y attacking Iraq, we automatically made Iran a regional power. We took out their major adversary in Iraq, and we neutralized, if only temporarily, the Taliban, on the other side. And so now we see not only that they are regional powers, but clearly indications of aspirations to be perhaps a hegemon in the area, their role in Iraq, their role in Syria, in Lebanon as well. And I can tell you, and I think you’ve heard it already, that there is real fear among the GCC countries about where all of this is going. All of them have minorities, in one case it’s not a minority, it’s a majority of Shias, and as the Sheika correctly pointed out, they can’t exchange Iran for some place else.”
    —General Joseph P. Hoar (USMC, Ret.), former commander of U.S. Central Command (1991-94), National Council On U.S.-Arab Relations, 17th Annual Arab-U.S. Policymakers Conference, October 30, 2008
  • Middle East Analysis

    May 23, 2007
    "One of the bipartisan Iraq Study Group’s key recommendations was a comprehensive regional diplomacy aimed at managing and resolving conflicts in the Middle East."

    Events on the ground in Lebanon demonstrate more than ever the need for continued U.S. engagement in the Middle East.

    The rapidly escalating violence early this week in the Nahr al Bared camp in Lebanon, along with the tenuous situation in Gaza and the ongoing firing of Qassam rockets into Israel, underscores the fragility and volatility of the region.

    The fighting in northern Lebanon reflects complexity and sharp divisions in Lebanese politics, the continued influence of Syria, and the interlocking nature of Middle East issues for U.S. interests and policy.

    After two days of gunfights between Lebanese security forces and militants and dozens killed and wounded after a raid against the terrorist group Fatah al-Islam sparked violence on Sunday, a tentative cease-fire was reached. The United States said on Tuesday it was considering an urgent request from Lebanon for more U.S. military aid to battle these militants groups, supplementing the $40 million in military assistance it has provided Lebanon thus far this year.

    Fatah al-Islam is a small splinter group with ties to global terror networks – a suspect in last summer’s foiled Germany train bombings was reportedly killed in the fighting. Fatah al-Islam’s leader had ties to Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi, the former leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq. Fatah al-Islam has used organized criminal activity to fund some of its activities. It opposes the major Palestinian factions, including the Palestinian Liberation Organization and Hamas. This group has nothing to do with the main Palestinian faction Fatah.

    The militant Islamist groups in the Lebanon camps are seizing on the disorder in Iraq and the lack of opportunity and political horizon for hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees in Lebanon and elsewhere to foment their radical agenda. Meanwhile, Iran continues to be a main supporter of Hezbollah.

    Militants and extremists are exploiting vacuums. Security vacuums have grown over the past few years – not only in Iraq, but also in Gaza and places like refugee camps in Lebanon.The United States needs a comprehensive approach to promote stability and law and order in the Middle East – one that supports building strong institutions like local police and security forces with oversight from democratically elected governments.

    The United States needs to play a more active role in stabilizing the Middle East. One of the bipartisan Iraq Study Group’s key recommendations was a comprehensive regional diplomacy aimed at managing and resolving conflicts in the Middle East. Instead of walking away from tough diplomacy, the United States needs to roll up its sleeves and get more engaged in international efforts to resolve conflicts in the Middle East. It should carefully look again at the Iraq Study Group’s recommendations and develop a pragmatic diplomatic strategy for resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict.

    In addition, it should work to develop a more comprehensive effort to help legitimate government security forces and police agencies operate with oversight from representative government bodies. The U.S. should provide the assistance that Lebanon seeks; this support is a necessary first step to establish the law and order needed to address the growing threat of global terror networks and eliminate the security vacuums that have grown in the past six years in the Middle East.