Stay Informed

Sign up to receive the Middle East Bulletin!

Support Middle East Progress

In-Depth Coverage

Original Commentaries

09/04/08
From Zero-Sum to Win-Win  —Mara Rudman, adviser, Middle East Progress; senior fellow, Center for American Progress. Original Commentary for Middle East Bulletin.
09/04/08
How Progress Is Possible  —
08/07/08
How to Deal with Jerusalem  —Lt. Col. (Res.) Ron Shatzberg, Project Director, Economic Cooperation Foundation. Interview with Middle East Bulletin.

Setting the Record Straight

Two-State Solution Still Best Option

“In practical terms, we can reach two conclusions: First, a final-status agreement, although its details are known, cannot be secured in the foreseeable future. Second, the time has come to think about other solutions. One of them is a return not to the 1967 borders, but rather, to the reality that prevailed in 1967, when Jordan controlled the West Bank.”
—Major General (ret.) Giora Eiland, “The Jordanian Option,” YNet, September 3, 2008 versus
  • "On both sides of the green line and, indeed, wherever people think about solutions to the Israeli- Palestinian conflict, a lot of old/new thinking is taking place. … Most of these ideas are patently unrealistic. Discussion of them often reflects despair, not pragmatic strategic thinking. … Precisely because there is no such alternative, other options more readily suggest themselves, ranging from temporary conflict management to three states or entities. Nor does failure today mean that tomorrow we cannot try again to arrive at a two-state solution, which remains the best option for all."
    —Yossi Alpher, coeditor of the bitterlemons family of internet publications & former director, Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, Tel Aviv University, "One State Definitely Not an Option," bitterlemons.org, August 18, 2008
  • Middle East Analysis

    • How Progress Is Possible —Hiba Husseini, chair, Legal Committee to Final Status Negotiations between the Palestinians and Israelis; former vice chairperson of the Palestine Securities Exchange (1998-May 2005). Interview with Middle East Bulletin.
    • Perils of an Israeli Transition —The New York Times, Editorial
    • The Arabs Will Look Differently Upon America —Ron Pundak, director general of the Peres Center for Peace and former architects and negotiators of the Oslo Agreement (bitterlemons.org)
    September 24, 2007

    Despite the al-Qaeda-backed attacks which have killed more than 50 people in Algeria, it is reassuring that President Abdel-Aziz Bouteflika insists that terrorism in his country is in retreat. But the scale and sheer brutality of the two days of violence is so reminiscent of what Algerians endured in the 1990s that one cannot but help think Bouteflika is just as concerned as the war-weary citizens themselves. …

    The war [of the 1990s] left the country at the crossroads and coincided with a resurgence of popular calls for democratic transformation in Algeria and neighboring countries.

    However, such change has been slow and halting. The country is in a dual crisis of confidence that concerns its essence as well as its performance as an emerging nation bent on political reform. It is a crisis that is part of — but goes beyond — the crisis of the Maghreb of northwest Africa. Resource-rich Algeria is a potentially wealthy country but it desperately needs long-term peace and stability. It understands that peace and prosperity are interrelated. Algeria is also a nation with great moral and political weight due to the Pan-Arab aspirations of Hawari Boumedienne, the diplomatic acumen of Bouteflika and its long and unique legacy of struggle for national liberation.

    This land of a million martyrs lost during the war of liberation is no stranger to violence. However, fighting a colonizer is one battle; warring against fellow citizens and fellow Muslims is an entirely different matter. Movements that politicize Islam using violence as the preferred method have no place in Algeria or anywhere else. Access the full article>>