Stay Informed

Sign up to receive the Middle East Bulletin!

Support Middle East Progress

In-Depth Coverage

Original Commentaries

08/07/08
How to Deal with Jerusalem  —Lt. Col. (Res.) Ron Shatzberg, Project Director, Economic Cooperation Foundation. Interview with Middle East Bulletin.
08/07/08
How to Deal with Jerusalem  —
08/05/08
Why Did Maliki Call for a Timeline?  —by Christopher Kojm who teaches at the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University and is a former senior advisor to the Iraq Study Group. Original Commentary for Middle East Bulletin.

Setting the Record Straight

Already Divided

“Even the Arab minority in the city has shown its preference for living under Israeli rule, as many have moved to the Israeli side of the security barrier being built around Jerusalem. Their choice is reasonable, as Jerusalem offers the quality of life of a modern western city while only a few kilometers away the norm is a third world standard of living, chaos and religious intolerance. An undivided Jerusalem is the best guarantee of a better life for all Jerusalemites.”
—Nathan Diament, Director of Public Policy, Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America, July 23, 2008 versus
  • “Those who believe that Jerusalem should not be divided, and mean by that that the Arab neighborhoods should not be separated from the city, should be the first to insist that an active policy be adopted by the government and the municipality to improve the lot of local Arab residents. Barring that, Jerusalem will continue to remain a divided city.”
    —Moshe Arens, former Israeli defense and foreign minister (Likud), “A Story of Neglect,” Haaretz, July 28, 2008
  • Middle East Analysis

    January 14, 2008

    With all of the limitations that the U.S. presidential schedule places on the Middle East peace process, the opportunity created by the rare combination of Bush, Olmert and Abbas must not be missed. All three want to reach an agreement that will present the outline for a Palestinian state and an end to the Israeli occupation in the territories. …

    At the Annapolis summit the three undertook to make the greatest effort possible to achieve an agreement by the end of the current year. In Jerusalem… Bush reiterated that this goal is attainable. The parties have sufficient time at their disposal to formulate agreed solutions to the "core issues" and the practical problems on which there is disagreement. …

    The experience from the last several years teaches that Olmert and Abbas need more than goodwill - they need all the support from the president of the United States that they can muster in order to make progress. Bush’s visit to the region extricated the negotiations from the mud in which they sank after Annapolis and pushed the parties into starting talks on the core issues. For these talks to move forward and turn into an agreement, they will need careful shepherding by the United States. …

    In Wednesday’s press conference at the Prime Minister’s residence Bush spoke, perhaps slightly in jest, about "nudging them forward," calling his trip here "a pretty significant nudge." The president clearly understands his critical, irreplaceable role in advancing the peace process. The year remaining to him in the White House is the right time to realize that responsibility and to rescue the two-state solution. It must not be viewed as time that is lost from the get-go. Access the full article>>