Stay Informed

Sign up to receive the Middle East Bulletin!

Support Middle East Progress

In-Depth Coverage

Original Commentaries

08/07/08
How to Deal with Jerusalem  —Lt. Col. (Res.) Ron Shatzberg, Project Director, Economic Cooperation Foundation. Interview with Middle East Bulletin.
08/07/08
How to Deal with Jerusalem  —
08/05/08
Why Did Maliki Call for a Timeline?  —by Christopher Kojm who teaches at the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University and is a former senior advisor to the Iraq Study Group. Original Commentary for Middle East Bulletin.

Setting the Record Straight

Already Divided

“Even the Arab minority in the city has shown its preference for living under Israeli rule, as many have moved to the Israeli side of the security barrier being built around Jerusalem. Their choice is reasonable, as Jerusalem offers the quality of life of a modern western city while only a few kilometers away the norm is a third world standard of living, chaos and religious intolerance. An undivided Jerusalem is the best guarantee of a better life for all Jerusalemites.”
—Nathan Diament, Director of Public Policy, Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America, July 23, 2008 versus
  • “Those who believe that Jerusalem should not be divided, and mean by that that the Arab neighborhoods should not be separated from the city, should be the first to insist that an active policy be adopted by the government and the municipality to improve the lot of local Arab residents. Barring that, Jerusalem will continue to remain a divided city.”
    —Moshe Arens, former Israeli defense and foreign minister (Likud), “A Story of Neglect,” Haaretz, July 28, 2008
  • Middle East Analysis

    March 31, 2008

    Saudi Arabia was once the Syrian regime’s biggest supporter, providing aid to Damascus to the tune of millions of dollars during the first Gulf War as a reward for Syrian membership of the U.S.-led coalition against Saddam. However, relations between Syria and Saudi Arabia have been steadily worsening ever since Bashar al-Assad came to power in 2000. Once considered sister countries, the traditional Arab alliance between Syria and Saudi Arabia has begun to fray due to differences stemming from foreign policy. …

    No subject has proven more central to the unraveling of this relationship than that of Lebanon. In addition to differing views over who should govern Lebanon, the Saudi government has been frustrated with Syrian policy toward Iraq. Saudi perceptions of Syrian complacency toward the cross border traffic of Saudi jihadists into Iraq tops the list of Riyadh’s grievances on this front. …

    Given this recent history, Riyadh’s insistence that the White House invite Damascus to last November’s Middle East summit in Annapolis seems odd. Yet the Saudis may have viewed the meeting as a last ditch attempt to bring the Syrians back into the fold. Along with Washington and other Arab capitals, Riyadh has become more and more worried by the increasingly close ties between Syria and Iran as of late. … Ironically, however, Saudi criticism of Syrian positions on Iraq and Lebanon may only have served to further isolate Damascus, pushing it into Tehran’s welcoming arms. Access the full article>>