The Israel-Palestine file is ostensibly not a major strategic issue in terms of American global policy. Yet history shows that without a hard and fast resolution of that file the conflict will continue to affect American strategic interests. …
The new president will not have the luxury of beginning his term while doing nothing to advance a Middle East peace process. The many regional challenges demand a move that embraces the broadest possible context, beginning with the Israeli- Palestinian conflict but expanding toward Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, Hamas, Shi’ites, Hezbollah and additional threats to the moderate states in the Middle East. It is easier to withdraw from Iraq and to fight bin Laden’s terror when America is taking the lead in a strategic peace process.
Time is running out. Hence a dual process, initiated by America, must be advanced as quickly as possible and must lead to two political settlements—between Israel and the Palestinians and between Israel and Syria. We are not referring to detailed peace agreements but rather to detailed declarations of principles, including maps, that place the entire region on a new road—one that rests on the foundation of the Arab peace initiative. … A double agreement, with Syria and the Palestinians, in effect realizes the historic Israeli aspiration … to end the Arab-Israel conflict and establish "normal relations" with all 22 members of the Arab League. Such a Middle East is decidedly an American interest. Access the full article>>

